aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/remarks/WR-026.txt
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to '')
-rw-r--r--remarks/WR-026.txt87
1 files changed, 87 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/remarks/WR-026.txt b/remarks/WR-026.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..1ee1fe7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/remarks/WR-026.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,87 @@
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Document: WR-026 P. Webb
+ 2026.07.23
+
+ On Codeberg banning crypto and LLM-assisted repos
+
+Body
+
+ The great thing about the internet is that other people have the same
+ thoughts as you, saving you from typing your own novel. Case in
+ point[1]:
+
+ > It’s frankly a bit snotty of _Codeberg_ to make this argument at
+ > all, considering that the platform effectively lives inside the
+ > _Forgejo_ bubble, and _Forgejo_ ~~mutinied~~ _inherited_ its
+ > community of active contributors from _Gitea_, who had spent the
+ > better part of six years building that community before _Forgejo_
+ > even existed. A project that acquired its own community by
+ > hard-forking someone else’s, then turned around to lecture solo
+ > developers about not having one, is a difficult position to argue
+ > from with a straight face.
+ >
+ > In addition, _Codeberg_ conflates _“having a community”_ with
+ > _“being legitimate software worth hosting”_, when the bar for a
+ > personal project has always been a working build, ideally a
+ > license, and maybe a README, and not a channel full of
+ > contributors. A good deal of what makes the small, single-author
+ > tool ecosystem worth having is precisely that it doesn’t need a
+ > community to justify its existence, and a forge whose entire
+ > selling point is hosting the code of individuals is an odd place to
+ > argue the opposite.
+
+ and[2]:
+
+ > I'm sure you have some morally high reasons to stand against
+ > cryptocurrency, but the "illicit trade" and "evasion of sanctions"
+ > cited by sourcehut (since you seem to base your decision on it) are
+ > also what allows regular people, including LGBTQ+ people, living in
+ > sanctioned countries (which also, what a surprise, turn out to be
+ > unsafe for LGBTQ+ folk a lot of the time), to buy goods and
+ > send/receive money from abroad without being prosecuted by their
+ > governments (hi foreign agent laws! hi "extremism" and
+ > "terrorism" laws!).
+ >
+ > I'm sorry, anti-war transgender person stuck in Russia, but from
+ > our moral stance, you shouldn't be able to purchase HRT from a lab
+ > using your XMR wallet. nor should your friend be able to pay for
+ > their foreign VPN VDS that they use to bypass the internet
+ > restrictions in USDT. the projects you used for this were hosted on
+ > Codeberg and not some other platform? well, too bad, they'll have
+ > to go someplace else that minds your existence or is welcoming to
+ > cryptocurrency as a whole, and you will wait. you and the tools you
+ > use will move to a greedy corporate hosting that is likely to
+ > impose its own restrictions on you in the future, or, even better,
+ > move to a less reliable self-hosted option, one per each tool to
+ > make it less maintainable and less accessible.
+ >
+ > by taking this stance, at least from my perspective, you're just
+ > projecting your morally high delusion of dirty illicit 3rd world
+ > crypto scammers that are damaging the moral purity of Codeberg
+ > by... hosting code for their projects here?! which, mind you,
+ > almost all the time will just contain tools, _tools_ to do good or
+ > bad. do you want to ban BitTorrent-related projects from Codeberg
+ > next because they are "mostly used to get illegal access to
+ > unlicensed digital goods and services (piracy)" and also take up
+ > world bandwidth and compute? how about banning YouTube downloaders
+ > after those? hey, let's make it clear that Codeberg will not stand
+ > a single repo on its platform that involves encrypted messaging:
+ > you know only criminals use Matrix, right?
+
+ finally, from your's truly[3]:
+
+ > They really quoted the FBI Director in their reasoning? Unserious
+ > people. Anything law enforcement can’t peek into is “designed
+ > for criminals.”
+
+References
+
+ [1] <https://マリウス.com/i-regret-migrating-to-codeberg>
+ [2] <https://codeberg.org/Codeberg/org/pulls/1254#issuecomment-19918579>
+ [3] <https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49021315>